On the flip side, some teams with low win rates but that have traditionally been very popular – and the poster boys for this category are Orcs and Humans – do show strongly here.įast forward to the initial year of BB20 and the shake-up is just as evident as the win rates showed, with Underworld capturing huge numbers of tourneys during this period. The only reason Amazons are not as high as their usual peers is that they have always seen relatively low representation. Let’s contrast the above with the teams that are actually winning (or achieving runner-up) in Tournaments in the same time periods.Īs with our historical win rates, we have some familiar names at the top of our pre-BB20 meta. Both flavours of Dwarves soar, and several other previously-moribund teams find a way to shine.Īnd finally, looking at ‘22, the current post-faq era, we see that the old order has somewhat reasserted itself, though some of our new faces don’t appear to be going anywhere Tournament Winners Underworld reach absolutely unprecedented heights.
Our five dominant teams all crash several percentage points, some slipping to below 50% win rates. The transformation of that meta in our first year of BB20 play speaks for itself. Lower down the list we see some very competitive teams who have very middle of the road win rates (Dwarves, Skaven).Īnd perhaps unsurprisingly, our historical meta is propped up by our iconic stunty teams. The teams below them start to see a mix of Tier 1 teams who were reined in by their Tier, and Tier 2 teams who found success with their additional help. Wood Elves, Lizardmen, Undead, Amazons and Dark Elves were teams that not only consistently found themselves in Tier 1 in rules packs (thus getting the least amount of benefit from them) but that also maintained the best win rates in the game. Barring the late charge of the initial release of Old World Alliance, BB had five teams who ruled the roost. Let’s talk a little about the historical meta first.
0 kommentar(er)
